The truth, however, is that such a comparison is almost doomed to failure. Comparing the two, of course, is inevitable. But one thing is clear: This new Mac OS offers at least as much of an advance for users of that platform as does XP on the PC. By that time, Microsoft had already released XP to manufacturing, so whether certain features debuted first on one system or the other is unclear. Microsoft and Apple developed XP and OS X in parallel, and although the first version of OS X (10.0) shipped months ago (in March), the OS wasn't ready for consumers and casual users until 10.1's release in late September. Last January, Microsoft unleashed a similar marketing campaign just days before Apple. On the Mac, this concept is called "the center of your digital lifestyle " Apple markets the system's connectivity with digital media, the Internet, and various types of devices. And both OSs seek to integrate into your digital life. On the Mac, the UI is called Aqua, an appropriate name given the modulating blue gel-cap buttons and liquid-like onscreen elements. Both XP and OS X feature a colorful new UI. On the Mac, this kernel is called Mach, and it's based on rock-solid UNIX technology, giving Mac users a break from the system-error bombs that plague older versions of Apple's OS. Both OSs are based on a solid core, or kernel, that was previously unavailable to consumers. The parallels between XP on the PC side and OS X on the Mac side are none too subtle. It's called Mac OS X (pronounced ten), and the latest revision-version 10.1-is the first revision that's worthy of your attention, regardless of which OS you currently use. After years of work, Apple has finally released a bulletproof next-generation OS that's as easy to use as it is easy on the eyes. But the Mac is undergoing a renaissance these days, similar to the sweeping improvements the PC world is experiencing with Windows XP. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form.To the hundreds of millions of Windows users, news about Macintosh enhancements might barely register on their collective radar. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |